Tampilkan postingan dengan label Pitch Pine. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Pitch Pine. Tampilkan semua postingan

Sabtu, 26 September 2015

Mountain Bog Recovery & Expansion

Bog edge, before thinning (June 2015)
Bog edge, after thinning (July 2015)

The above images were taken near the perimeter of a so-called "mountain bog" in western North Carolina.  The first image shows the conditions before active restoration, the second image shows the same locale after clearing dense rhododendron invasion.  The only evident trees in the initial image are red maple and a lone pitch pine (Pinus rigida). After clearing the dense brush, a number of previously hidden stems of Pitch Pine in the heart of the wetland become apparent. The images also document (especially the second one) a small tributary creek feeding into the site from a black plastic culvert. Hugging the margin of this tributary (just past the lone pitch pine) is a grove of pitcher plants (see image below). 

Numerous pitcher plants (Sarracenia jonesii) hiding in this dense herbaceous foliage
At one time other rare plants were apparently present here when the creek was able to fan out gradually across the area, and the site was more open. However, years ago a road was constructed through the edge of the wetland. Several feet of fill material buried portions of the wetland, and altered the hydrology in some subtle and not so subtle ways (plans are in the works to remove the offending road section and culvert in hopes of restoring more natural water flows and reopening original wetland surface area for bog plants, stay tuned!). The dense thicket of shrubs that developed along the altered stream course excluded nearly all ground layer plant diversity directly underneath. In addition, the thick wall of green created both a sun and rain shadow across the nearby pitcher plants (these pitchers thrive in open sun, in saturated soils).   

Bog edge, before Rhododendron removal (June 2015)
Bog edge, after Rhododendron removal (July 2015) 

Numerous studies have shown that canopy vegetation can intercept and effectively remove up to 50% of seasonal or annual rainfall (Carlyle-Moses and Gash 2011, Forest Hydrology and Biochemistry). In contrast to deciduous plants, the evergreen rhododendrons continue to intercept rainfall all year long. At this site, the result could be losses of as much as 30" of water recharge per year! By removing the wall of rhododendrons we hope to create more open, sunlit conditions and add water back into the wetland system.  

Pile of Rhododendron previously removed from interior and margins of bog

We have been working on this restoration for several years, having been slowed mainly by lack of funding and resources to complete the task; the Friends of Plant Conservation (www.ncplantfriends.org) has recently established a means by which people can support this effort. 

Mountain Bog interior conditions in 2011, before restoration, note forked pine tree

Mountain bog conditions in 2014 after interior brush removal, note forked pine
Elsewhere on this blog I have discussed a few of the rare plants whose populations have begun to rebound due, in part, to these restoration efforts.  Won't you help this progress continue?

Senin, 01 September 2014

Pine Barrens & Grasslands in New England; Part II

In a previous post I briefly discussed two examples of fire-maintained vegetation in southern New England (http://ncplantcon.blogspot.com/2014/08/pine-barrens-grasslands-in-new-england.html). Ecologically similar sites, often referred to as "pine barrens" or "pitch pine barrens" are scattered around the region.  I visited examples of this unique vegetation in Maine, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts in late summer (2014).

Pitch Pine barren near Waterboro, Maine
understory of lowbush blueberry, sweetfern, and bear oak


Some examples were enchanting forests; gnarly & twisted pines with charred boles, multiple age classes, and patchy ground cover openings. All sites occurred on "sandplains" or glacial outwash plains. These deep sandy soils supported two consistent species across all sites visited; Pitch pine (Pinus rigida) & Bear Oak (Quercus ilicifolia). Bear Oak was often heavily dominant as a tall shrub or dense midstory layer.
Pinus rigida bole displaying epicormic shoots
Bear Oak (Quercus ilicifolia)

Many areas I visited were thickly stocked with dense Pitch Pine, while others were open woodlands. Fire history could partially explain those density differences, with more frequently burned sites supporting the woodlands.

Much of the region around the Waterboro Barrens, was burned over in Maine's largest series of forest fires in 1947. Since that time (and prior to restoration work), a 93% decline in open canopy pitch pine has been documented (2).


In addition to the loss of open woodlands, Patterson (1) found that stands unburned since 1947 had developed highly volatile, well aerated fuels conducive to high intensity, fast moving fires.
Waterboro Barrens thinning;
dense forest (left) unthinned, open woodland (right) mechanically thinned. 
Not surprisingly, a proactive management strategy of mechanically thinning trees and brush around exterior boundaries of the site has been implemented. This strategy serves a dual purpose of minimizing fire behavior while "restoring" some of the open canopy woodlands that have been lost. This management strategy was also being implemented at a New Hampshire site I visited. Hand crews were actively cutting, clearing, and piling brush in much the same way we have done on fire reintroduction projects in North Carolina (one of which involved pitch pine). Examples shown here (below) were presumably thinned to achieve this open structure.

Waterboro, Maine
Concord, New Hampshire


Pitch Pine Woodlands:
(contrast both to image at top of page)





While appearing structurally similar, understory composition varied considerably; Concord (right) was much richer floristically and perhaps has a longer and/or more recent history of prescribed fire; prescribed burns began there in 2003 and ~ 20 acres or so have been burned in most years since then (3). Managers at Concord have a compelling reason to reintroduce fire. In addition to restoring a rare and declining natural community type, and reducing wildfire risk, their site is the only location in New Hampshire and the world's easternmost location known to support the Karner Blue Butterfly (4).
Karner Blue (Lycaeides melissa samuelis), Concord, NH
Thanks to Harry LeGrand for ID confirmation!
This federally endangered species (also found in the midwestern US, and mentioned in an earlier blog regarding the connection with Sundial Lupine) has been reintroduced to the site, along with Lupines by biologists in New Hampshire.  One relatively small portion of the site was exceptional for its grassy character (see image below). I observed a number of plants there, but in no other "barrens", including Big Bluestem, DogBane, New Jersey Tea, Ground Cherry, and others.
Grassy open Pitch Pine Barren@Concord, New Hampshire






Karner Blue (?) perched on Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum)@ Concord, New Hampshire

It will be interesting to see what management activities, especially prescribed fires, are conducted across these barrens and the results they achieve. Reducing dangerous fuel loads while restoring more natural structure seems like a logical way forward (see below), but the real proof comes with fire.

Brush piles from hand clearing around large Pitch Pine @ Concord, NH



References:
(1) http://www.umass.edu/nebarrensfuels/publications/pdfs/waterboro_pot_fire_bx.pdf
(2) http://www.umass.edu/nebarrensfuels/ne_barrens/waterboro_kennebunk_hollis/waterboro.html
(3) http://www.wildlife.state.nh.us/Wildlife/Nongame/projects/karner_project.html
(4) http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/kbb/pdf/kbb5YrReviewSept2012.pdf

Sabtu, 09 Agustus 2014

Pitch Pine in Paradise


Although White Pine is the quintessential New England pine tree, Southern New England lies well within the natural range of Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida).   This tree is most often associated with relatively frequent fire and serotinous cones (covered in natural resins that must be melted by fire to release seeds). Therefore, I expect Pitch Pine to occur on sites or physical settings with the capability to experience periodic fires. I have visited a number of such places in the northeastern US, including NJ, Maine, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts.

Pitch Pine island view from across Paradise Pond

I recently noticed an unusual Pitch Pine forest on a tiny island completely surrounded by water. Known as Paradise Pond this small site in central Massachusetts was the last place I expected to see these trees. Obviously, the context and size would make it extremely unlikely this stand of trees would have ever experienced "natural" fire.


Aerial view of "pitch pine island" in the middle of Paradise Pond, MA
A field inspection and specialized transportation were clearly necessary; a fully restored, antique Morris canoe filled the bill perfectly (thanks Jane McFadden!).


Various size classes of pines were present, many with branches draping over the water. The understory vegetation, thickest around the lower edges, included northern bayberry, Sweet Gale, Sweet Pepperbush, maleberry, and the usual edible fruit bearing Ericaceuous shrubs. Cowwheat (Melampyrum lineare) may be the most common herbaceous plant.

Non-serotinous Pitch Pine cones on Paradise Pond



Due to an ongoing rainstorm and a hastier than planned departure, I didn't pay close enough attention to the majority of the pine cones, but many were clearly open and appeared to lack well developed serotiny.








Later, a cursory literature search revealed that other sites in Massachusetts (on rocky knobs) lack serotiny (1). In addition, fire frequency has been shown to be a local determinant of serotiny with less frequently burned sites tending toward less or even absent serotiny (2).  The near impossibility of fire on "Pitch Pine Island", could therefore help explain the non-serotinous cones I noted.


As noted earlier, the interior of the island was almost completely dominated by Pitch Pine of various sizes (see image below). With no signs of lightning or prescribed fire (I called the "managing agency" responsible for this stand to ask about the trees - they said they were probably spruce!) it is unclear why other species are not entering the midstory or canopy. I have seen many other sites where White Pine or hardwoods have become dense and begin to compete with Pinus rigida for growing space with inadequate fire regimes.

Interior view of "Pitch Pine Island"

A cursory look around the dense forests in the vicinity revealed only White Pines (and a lone, relict Pitch Pine on a nearby island).

How did these pines get to the island?? Perhaps a topic for future research!

Typical shoreline forest dominated by White Pine

References:
(1) http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/sites/harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/files/publications/pdfs/Dwarf%20Pitch%20Pine_Motzkin%20and%20Orwig.pdf
(2) http://userwww.sfsu.edu/parker/bio821/papers/3-serotiny/Givnish1981.pdf

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

Categories

Unordered List

Text Widget

Pages

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.